![]() ![]() Something seems strange, or missing, here. Indeed, if they were using XP/Vista only code, how could it work under 98? And if it was XP/Vista only, why would they be uncertain if it would work or not? If they were using XP/Vista only code, they should know that it wouldn't work. So the whoever wrote 2.3 should have known what they were doing that was XP/Vista only. Presumably 2.3 came out of the same shop that produced 2.2 and the programmers had to know what worked in 98 and what worked only in XP to make it work under 98. ![]() How does a program developer not know what his program does?īoth of the people giving answers in the refererred thread are Foxit people and have access to the developers.Īccording to the posts here, Foxit supported 98 through 2.2, which I think was through the summer of this year, 2008, and had 98 testing facilities. They can't say yes or no because they simply don't know. Light on resources compaired to the newer versions and fast. File Hippo has it and all the newer versions. I had no problems using Foxit Reader with Win 98SE but I decided to just go back to the Foxit Reader version. you have to add a few plug-ins which are included in the version download but they are easy to find at the Foxit site, just save the plugins with your Foxit Reader download and you'll be set for the future. if you just want a simple, fast PDF reader. ver 2.3 crashed my machine so I decided to go back to the last version of 1.3. v is the last version to really work with Win 98SE. ![]() So put that in your crack pipe and smoke it, Foxit. I just posted this under another PDF thread. I find that SumatraPDF is, indeed, the best reader for everyday use. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |